Wk1 MACemdt comment 1

Ann,
You have addressed many of the issues that I also face as both an art teacher and an artist. I have made copies for my students out of many books from my library. I have stood at the copy machine knowing that I am in violation of the copyright laws, but I haven’t the heart to say, “Go buy your own books!” when all the student really wants is the pages on how to draw a velociraptor to practice at home.
I also appreciated the incite of Lawrence Lessig, representing Creative Commons. The concept behind the organization of creative materials encourages students to be creative in a collaborative manner.
Lastly, I was interested in your words regarding your family’s creative ventures. I saved the links and articles to send to my son’s father. He hasn’t written anything for years, and has since lost interest in his music, yet I still encourage him to gather his work together, and apply for copyrights if for no other reason than to share with his son.

Original post from Ann Cannizzaro:
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Week1_Reading_Copyright
Ciao! Now here's something new from Ann Cannizzaro.


I appreciate this opportunity to learn more about copyright law and the issues that are pending with the advancing technology and access to media works. It seems that as a society, we tend to do things in whatever way is convenient until we are made to do otherwise. I think this is true about copyright law. Historically, the author or owner of a work had to be the watchdog over a work, trying to “catch” anyone using it illegally. A civil suit would be the means of reclaiming any use or damages done. This is not a preventative measure. Rather, it is punitive. Unfortunately, it’s often more punitive for the copyright holder than it is for the perpetrator.

Photo courtesy of iStockphoto, Image# 5271774









As a public school teacher, I have considered copyright laws on many occasions as I stand at the Xerox machine copying workbook pages and activities for my students. At times, I have decided that what I didn’t know wouldn’t hurt me or anyone else. At other times, I have tried to limit my Xeroxing and pay more attention to copyright notices on my educational materials. As it turns out, much of what I copy is allowed for classroom instruction. Thank Goodness!

I have faced the issue of copyright again, while attending Full Sail University. I have incrementally added to my knowledge and awareness of copyright issues and laws. However, that “ocean of grey” still looms before me as I try to pick and choose images and ideas, as well as music, for my production pieces. I am earnest in wanting to learn more specific information. As an instructor, trying to promote 21st century skills for learning, I need to be ready to help my students understand copyright, and how they can work within it’s confines, to be creative and productive in their learning endeavors.

I appreciate the ads I see now on DVD previews that are aimed at kids, to begin educating them about copyright and the issues with piracy and sharing. It’s true that the media industry wants to prevent the illegal copying of music and video. However, technology allows for instant access and sharing that is yet unregulated in many venues.

The film “Good Copy/Bad Copy” brings up some interesting points. The U.S. Motion Picture Artists Association (MPAA) has an interest in stopping piracy due to a projected monetary loss of up to $6 billion dollars each year. However, worldwide markets are an open venue for pirated media. There will never be enough resources to stop piracy. Rather, the industry needs to educate people about the rights and respect due to the intellectual property holders and creators. An intrinsic incentive may come to reign at some time in our future. The nature of technology and open and immediate access to material will require a new focus. Laws will need to be developed that protect intellectual property rights and provide for media authorship, while promoting a creative and cultural vision for the people.

Lawrence Lessig, representing Creative Commons, argues that copyright laws “are so expansive and complex” that they will inhibit creativity. The idea behind creative commons is that an artist can choose to what extent and in what manner, another person may “use” their work to produce something “new”. The work is licensed for use by others. This is a legal means of building positive relationships between producers and users of intellectual property. Still, I found the remarks made by Ronaldo Lemos, a professor of law in Brazil, very telling. The more recent changes to copyright laws have been made to protect industry giants primarily from North America (remember the MPAA?). His understanding of the intent of the laws is to “prevent society from becoming the producer of culture in itself and for itself”. I’m not surprised that big business wants to have the authority to determine how copyright law evolves.

http://www.rastervector.com/page3_blog_entry130...ht.jpg

All of this is very interesting food for thought. My husband wants to be able to protect his rights to a family history he is writing. My son wants to protect his rights with regards to his photography. I hope to be the go to person when the time comes to decide how to share, show, or publish their work. Educate me!


Copyright Images from Google Images.